<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Work-life balance &#8220;pop quiz&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/</link>
	<description>"Vision without action is a daydream.  Action without vision is a nightmare." - Japanese Proverb</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 07:19:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen P. Katz</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen P. Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/?p=218#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Work-life balance is a topic frequently examined in generational terms.  It is the Traditionalists (50-60&#039;s) who have difficulty accepting balance: they tend to see work and life the way that Descartes saw the mind and body - separate entities.  
As a career coach, I have encountered many members of the Boomer generation whose work values have evolved to resemble those of the up and coming Millennials.  These 20-30-somethings and their parents demand balance; interesting that the Gen X&#039;ers (30-40&#039;s) still seem prefer to work and play separately. 
These generalizations support the conversation Jason and I had the other day, with the &quot;Recruiting Animal&quot; as our foil.  It seems that recruiters depend upon Gen X&#039;ers to fill the traditional roles in business and industry. Members of other generations are less likely to fix on salary and status, preferring to conduct a proactive search for a position that offers work-life balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work-life balance is a topic frequently examined in generational terms.  It is the Traditionalists (50-60&#8217;s) who have difficulty accepting balance: they tend to see work and life the way that Descartes saw the mind and body &#8211; separate entities.<br />
As a career coach, I have encountered many members of the Boomer generation whose work values have evolved to resemble those of the up and coming Millennials.  These 20-30-somethings and their parents demand balance; interesting that the Gen X&#8217;ers (30-40&#8217;s) still seem prefer to work and play separately.<br />
These generalizations support the conversation Jason and I had the other day, with the &#8220;Recruiting Animal&#8221; as our foil.  It seems that recruiters depend upon Gen X&#8217;ers to fill the traditional roles in business and industry. Members of other generations are less likely to fix on salary and status, preferring to conduct a proactive search for a position that offers work-life balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Beckford</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Beckford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/?p=218#comment-52</guid>
		<description>@Paul &quot;With understanding in the right areas, work and non-work no longer need to be opposed against one another. Instead they can be understood for what they have in common.&quot;

Completely agree.  In fact, the inter-relation between work, health and family are so intertwined it is actually hard to prioritize.  For example, if you are stressed/miserable at work, that affects your family and health.  It is a twisted tale indeed.

@Mike Thanks for the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8220;With understanding in the right areas, work and non-work no longer need to be opposed against one another. Instead they can be understood for what they have in common.&#8221;</p>
<p>Completely agree.  In fact, the inter-relation between work, health and family are so intertwined it is actually hard to prioritize.  For example, if you are stressed/miserable at work, that affects your family and health.  It is a twisted tale indeed.</p>
<p>@Mike Thanks for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/?p=218#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Complete agreement on the priority. Would be interesting to see differing opinions and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete agreement on the priority. Would be interesting to see differing opinions and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/2008/09/29/work-life-balance-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptiveleadership.com/?p=218#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree with the way you justify and break down the priorities but I do think that work/life balance is flawed as a career philosophy. The conflict between &#039;work&#039; and &#039;non-work&#039; in our lives did need to be understood and work/life balance (which was coined as a term in the 70s) has achieved this purpose for many people. It is however far less effective when applied to career long planning and understanding an individual&#039;s relationship with work. With understanding in the right areas, work and non-work no longer need to be opposed against one another. Instead they can be understood for what they have in common. As the next generation make a more concerted effort to understand their relationship with work, I&#039;m not convinced they will be doing it with work/life balance in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the way you justify and break down the priorities but I do think that work/life balance is flawed as a career philosophy. The conflict between &#8216;work&#8217; and &#8216;non-work&#8217; in our lives did need to be understood and work/life balance (which was coined as a term in the 70s) has achieved this purpose for many people. It is however far less effective when applied to career long planning and understanding an individual&#8217;s relationship with work. With understanding in the right areas, work and non-work no longer need to be opposed against one another. Instead they can be understood for what they have in common. As the next generation make a more concerted effort to understand their relationship with work, I&#8217;m not convinced they will be doing it with work/life balance in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
